Daily News
img1

14-04-2023

12:00:AM

804 Views


Table of Content


  • GS-1: Modern History
    • Ambedkar Jayanti 2023: Ambedkar, Gandhi and the issue of separate electorates
  • Fact File
  • The Mahad Satyagraha: Ambedkar and the foundation event of the Dalit movement



Ambedkar Jayanti 2023: Ambedkar, Gandhi and the issue of separate electorates

GS-1:The Freedom Struggle — its various stages and important contributors/contributions from different parts of the country.

 

In India, there exists a system of reservations based on caste that reserves a certain number of seats for individuals who have historically facedsocial and economic discrimination. These reservations are applicable in various domains, including higher education, government jobs, and even political office. All legislative bodies, including Parliament, have a specific number of seats reserved for scheduled castes (SCs) and scheduled tribes (STs). 


It is worth noting that reservations were not the only affirmative action mode suggested. Dr BR Ambedkar, for instance, advocated for a separate electorate mode. In the early 1930s, there was a major debate on the matter of separate electorates for lower castes, with Dr Ambedkar and Mahatma Gandhi, two of India's most prominent leaders, standing on opposing sides.


https://drambedkarbooks.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/reservation1.jpgIt is worth noting that reservations were not the only affirmative action mode suggested. Dr BR Ambedkar, for instance, advocated for a separate electorate mode. In the early 1930s, there was a major debate on the matter of separate electorates for lower castes, with Dr Ambedkar and Mahatma Gandhi, two of India's most prominent leaders, standing on opposing sides.


Ambedkar’s views on caste

  • Ambedkar's views on caste rejected the institution of caste itself, unlike Gandhi who advocated for reforming the caste system by abolishing untouchability.
  • Ambedkar saw contemporary upper caste Hindus' reformism as inadequate to undo millennia of discrimination.
  • Ambedkar believed that any revolt against the caste system would only be possible after the oppressed rejected their condition and oppression as being divinely ordained.
  • Ambedkar's political program emphasized lower castes obtaining political power.
  • According to Ambedkar, lower castes could remove their grievances only by getting political power in their hands.
  • Ambedkar suggested separate electorates as the form of affirmative action to empower lower castes.

 

Ambedkar’s arguments for separate electorates

  • During the First Round Table Conference in London, Ambedkar stated that the depressed classes were a distinct and separate group, and although they were included among Hindus, they did not form an integral part of that community.
  • The depressed classes believed they would not receive any political power unless the political machinery for the new constitution was of a special make.
  • Ambedkar advocated for separate electorates with a double vote - one for SCs to vote for an SC candidate and the other for SCs to vote in the general electorate.
  • Initially, Ambedkar rejected communal electorates(i.e. separate electorates for Hindus and Muslims) but later changed his position as he realized that while joint electorates could better integrate lower castes into the Hindu fold, they would do little to challenge their subservient position.
  • Ambedkar felt that unqualified joint electorates allowed the majority to influence the election of the representatives of the dalit community, thus disabling them from defending their interests against the tyranny of the majority.

 

Gandhiji’s Opposition

  • Gandhi opposed separate electorates as he believed they did not do enough for lower castes. He thought that lower castes should aspire to rule the kingdom of the whole world instead of being restricted to a limited share of seats.
  • Gandhi feared that separate electorates would destroy Hinduism by driving a wedge within the community.
  • Gandhi understood that the British had exploited internal divisions in Indian society for their own purposes, and separate electorates would only help them continue with their divide and rule policy.
  • At that time, there was rising antagonism between Hindus and Muslims. If separate electorates were announced for lower castes in addition to those for Muslims, this would significantly reduce the power that the caste Hindu leadership enjoyed by breaking the consolidated Hindu fold.

Communal Award

  • As a result of the Second Round Table Conference, in September 1931, the then Prime Minister of Britain Ramsay MacDonald gave his ‘award’, known as the Communal Award. 
  • It provided separate representation for the Forward Caste, Scheduled Caste, Muslims, Buddhists, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, Europeans and Scheduled Castes
  • The Scheduled Castes were assigned a number of seats to be filled by election from special constituencies in which scheduled castes could vote.
  • The Award was controversial as it was believed by some to have been brought in by the British to create social divide among the Hindus. Gandhi feared that it would disintegrate Hindu society.
  • However, the Communal Award was supported by many among the minority communities, most notably the leader of the Scheduled Castes, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.
  • According to Ambedkar, Gandhi was ready to award separate electorates to Muslims and Sikhs. But Gandhi was reluctant to give separate electorates to scheduled castes. He was afraid of division inside Congress and Hindu society due to separate scheduled caste representations. But Ambedkar insisted for separate electorate for scheduled caste.

 

The Poona Pact

  • Gandhi began a fast unto death on September 16, 1932, to protest against the British decision to create separate electorates based on caste while he was imprisoned in the Yerawada Jail in Pune.
  • Ambedkar disagreed with Gandhi's political alternative of reservations as he believed that upper castes would still dominate lower castes numerically, blunting possibilities for more radical social change.
  • Ambedkar was in a difficult position as Gandhi was a beloved leader and any harm that came to him could have severe consequences for the Dalit movement.
  • Ambedkar ultimately succumbed to Gandhi's pressure and signed the Poona Pact, which secured reservations for lower castes but put the question of separate electorates to rest.
  • Ambedkar was never satisfied with this outcome and viewed the Joint Electorate as a "Rotten Borough," in which Hindus could nominate an untouchable as a representative but ultimately control them as a tool.

Provisions of the Poona Pact

  • The Pact abandoned separate electorates for the depressed classes. But the seats reserved for the depressed classes were increased from 71 to 147 in provincial legislatures and 18 per cent of the total in the central legislature.
  • Election to seats shall be by joint electorates subject, however, to the following procedure: All members of the Depressed Classes registered in the general electoral roll of a constituency will form an electoral college which will elect a panel of four candidates belonging to the Depressed Classes for each of such reserved seats by the method of the single vote and four persons getting the highest number of votes in such primary elections shall be the candidates for election by the general electorate.
  • The system of primary election to a panel of candidates for election as before mentioned shall come to an end after the first ten years, unless terminated sooner by mutual agreement.
  • The system of representation of Depressed Classes by reserved seats shall continue until determined otherwise by mutual agreement between the communities concerned.
  • The Franchise of the Depressed Classes shall be as indicated, in the Lothian Committee (Indian Franchise Committee) Report.
  • There shall be no disabilities attached to any one on the ground of his being a member of the Depressed Classes in regard to any election to local bodies or appointment to the public services. Every endeavour shall be made to secure a fair representation of the Depressed Classes in these respects.
  • In every province out of the educational grant an adequate sum shall be ear-marked for providing educational facilities to the members of Depressed Classes.

[Ref- IE]



Fact File



The Mahad Satyagraha: Ambedkar and the foundation event of the Dalit movement

  • B.R. Ambedkar was a trailblazing figure in India, being the first Dalit to study at Bombay's ElphinstoneCollege and going on to become the chair of the drafting committee of the Indian Constitution and the first law minister of independent India. 
  • However, his most significant contribution was to the movement for Dalit emancipation, which he galvanized through his leadership of the Mahad Satyagraha in 1927. This event marked the first majorcollective protest by Dalits and awakened their consciousness, paving the way for their bid for political power.


Factors leading to Mahad Satyagraha


  • Discrimination and exclusion of Dalits from public places like wells, tanks, and chawls were prevalent in the 1920s in the town of Mahad in Maharashtra, India.
  • This discrimination was enforced by the upper-caste Hindus, who believed that sharing water with Dalits would pollute it.
  • The colonial British government, which ruled India at that time, did not take any concrete action against this discrimination, and this further emboldened the upper-caste Hindus.
  • B.R. Ambedkar, who was a prominent Dalit leader and social reformer, saw this discrimination as a violation of basic human rights and decided to launch a satyagraha (peaceful protest) to challenge it.


Mahad Satyagraha

  • The Mahad Satyagraha was a peaceful protest organized by B.R. Ambedkar and his followers on March 20, 1927, in Mahad, Maharashtra, India.
  • The objective of the satyagraha was to assert the right of Dalits to access water from the Chavdar tank, a public water body that was reserved for upper-caste Hindus.
  • Ambedkar and his followers marched to the Chavdar tank and drank water from it, challenging the discriminatory practice. This act of defiance caused widespread outrage among the upper-caste Hindus.
  • The upper-caste Hindus retaliated by attacking Dalits, burning their homes, and destroying their property. The British government intervened and arrested Ambedkar and his followers.
  • The Mahad Satyagraha was ultimately successful in getting the British government to issue a notification that all public water bodies in the region should be accessible to all communities regardless of caste or religion.


Significance of Mahad Satyagraha

  • The Mahad Satyagraha was a significant event in the Dalit rights movement in India and a milestone in B.R. Ambedkar's career as a social reformer and political leader.
  • The satyagraha challenged the entrenched caste system and inspired many Dalits to assert their rights and resist discrimination.
  • The Mahad Satyagraha also highlighted the need for political representation for Dalits and paved the way for the establishment of the Independent Labour Party, which Ambedkarfounded in 1936 to represent the Dalit community in politics.

Comments

Recent Comments